NuLeaf Naturals CBD Oil Review 2026: High Potency Worth the Hype?
*Affiliate Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to...
Read moreAffiliate Disclosure: CBDProducts.com participates in affiliate programs. When you click on product links on this page and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. Our editorial opinions are independent of affiliate relationships.
—
Charlotte’s Web and Lazarus Naturals are two of the most respected names in CBD. Both offer full-spectrum products, both have excellent third-party testing practices, and both have built large loyal customer bases. But they serve different types of buyers — and understanding the difference will help you make the right choice.
This is the head-to-head comparison you’ve been looking for.
—
Charlotte’s Web wins on: brand heritage, product variety, flavor selection, customer experience
Lazarus Naturals wins on: price, value, potency options, Assistance Program accessibility
If you want the best-known name in CBD with a premium experience: Charlotte’s Web.
If you want the best value for a quality full-spectrum product: Lazarus Naturals.
Now let’s dig into the details.
—
Founded in Colorado in 2012 by the Stanley Brothers, Charlotte’s Web is the brand that introduced CBD to mainstream America. Named after Charlotte Figi, a young girl whose story of using CBD for seizures was featured on CNN in 2013, Charlotte’s Web became the most recognized CBD name in the country.
They IPO’d on the Canadian Securities Exchange in 2018 — the first major CBD company to do so. They grow hemp on their own proprietary farms in Colorado using their own hemp genetics. Their extract quality is consistent and controlled.
Charlotte’s Web has a meaningful philanthropic component through the Charlotte’s Web Stanley Brothers Social Impact Fund, supporting CBD access and medical research.
Lazarus Naturals was founded in Portland, Oregon in 2016 with an explicit mission: make high-quality CBD affordable for everyone, not just people who can pay premium prices. Their signature achievement is the Assistance Program — 60% off for veterans, people on disability, and those with documented low income.
They grow hemp in Oregon, process in-house, and maintain rigorous batch-level testing. By controlling the supply chain and keeping overhead lean, they’ve driven costs down without compromising quality.
—
– CBD oil tinctures (5–60mg/mL, multiple flavors)
– CBD softgels (15mg and 25mg)
– CBD gummies (10mg per gummy, multiple formulas)
– CBD topicals (balm, cream, CBD salve)
– Pet products
Flavors: Mint Chocolate, Lemon Twist, Orange Blossom, Olive Oil — Charlotte’s Web has some of the best-tasting CBD tinctures on the market
Specialty products: Sleep gummies with melatonin, Calm gummies with lemon balm, Recovery gummies with ginger
– High Potency Full Spectrum CBD Tincture (multiple potencies, up to 6000mg)
– Full Spectrum CBD Capsules (10mg, 25mg, 50mg)
– CBD balm
– Pet tinctures
– CBD isolate products
Flavors: Natural, Mango, Chocolate Mint, Blood Orange, Yuzu
Specialty products: High-potency athlete-oriented line, isolate options, sleep tincture
Verdict: Charlotte’s Web wins on variety and formulation creativity. Lazarus Naturals wins on potency range (going higher than Charlotte’s Web for serious users).
—
Both brands earn high marks here.
Charlotte’s Web: Third-party tested by multiple labs. CoAs available on their website. Covers cannabinoid content, heavy metals, pesticides, and microbial contaminants. CoA navigation is user-friendly.
Lazarus Naturals: Third-party tested by Kaycha Labs and others. Batch-specific CoAs very easy to find. Their transparency about testing methodology and processing is above average.
Verdict: Essentially a tie. Both are class-leading on testing. Lazarus Naturals has a slight edge in batch-level CoA accessibility; Charlotte’s Web has a slight edge in publishing terpene profiles for some products.
—
This is where the brands diverge most significantly.
Charlotte’s Web:
– 17mg/mL 30mL (510mg): ~$44.99
– 25mg/mL 30mL (750mg): ~$54.99
– 60mg/mL 30mL (1800mg): ~$94.99
– Cost per mg: 6–9 cents
Lazarus Naturals:
– 750mg 30mL: ~$30
– 1500mg 30mL: ~$50
– 3000mg 30mL: ~$80
– 6000mg 30mL: ~$130
– Cost per mg: 2–4 cents
With Lazarus Assistance Program (60% off):
– 1500mg: ~$20
– 3000mg: ~$32
– 6000mg: ~$52
Verdict: Lazarus Naturals wins decisively on price. At comparable potencies, Lazarus is typically 40–60% cheaper than Charlotte’s Web. With the Assistance Program, the gap becomes enormous.
—
Charlotte’s Web: Proprietary hemp genetics grown on their own Colorado farms. They’ve developed a specific cultivar bred for their characteristic cannabinoid profile. Organic farming practices (though USDA certification has varied by year).
Lazarus Naturals: Oregon-grown hemp from their own farms and partner farms. CO2 and ethanol extraction. Clean growing practices with third-party verification.
Verdict: Very similar quality. Charlotte’s Web has a marginal edge in hemp genetics consistency (proprietary cultivar vs. external sourcing). Both are excellent.
—
Charlotte’s Web: Strong customer service team. Good return policy. Educational content is excellent — one of the best CBD blogs in the industry. Well-designed website.
Lazarus Naturals: Good customer service. Simple, functional website. The Assistance Program application process is straightforward. Less polished brand experience than Charlotte’s Web but genuinely effective.
Verdict: Charlotte’s Web delivers a more premium brand experience. Lazarus Naturals is functional and honest.
—
– Users who value a trusted, well-known brand with a meaningful founding story
– Those who want the best flavor options in a tincture
– Buyers who want specialized formulations (sleep gummies with lemon balm, recovery gummies with ginger)
– People who want a premium unboxing and brand experience
– Gift purchases or first-time CBD buyers being introduced to the category
– Budget-conscious buyers who want maximum value
– Veterans, disability recipients, and low-income individuals eligible for the 60% Assistance Program
– High-dose users who need 50–100mg+ daily (Lazarus’s potency range makes this affordable)
– People who care primarily about extract quality and testing, not brand experience
– Regular, long-term CBD users for whom cost efficiency matters most
—
| Category | Charlotte’s Web | Lazarus Naturals |
|—|—|—|
| Price per mg | Higher | Lower |
| Product variety | More | Less |
| Flavor options | Excellent | Good |
| Testing transparency | Excellent | Excellent |
| Hemp sourcing | Proprietary farms | Owned + partner farms |
| High-dose options | Up to 60mg/mL | Up to 200mg/mL |
| Assistance Program | No | Yes (60% off) |
| Brand experience | Premium | Functional |
—
Charlotte’s Web and Lazarus Naturals are both excellent CBD brands — the comparison just depends on what you optimize for.
If you want the iconic, most-trusted name in CBD with a variety of flavors and formulations, Charlotte’s Web deserves its reputation and pricing.
If you want the best full-spectrum CBD extract for the money — or if you qualify for the Lazarus Naturals Assistance Program — Lazarus Naturals is the practical choice that delivers comparable quality at dramatically lower cost.
For most regular CBD users, Lazarus Naturals is the better long-term value. For special purchases, gifts, or users who want a premium CBD experience, Charlotte’s Web earns it.
These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. These products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

Interested in finding out more about what’s happening in the world of CBD and Medicinal Cannabis?
Head to CBD World News for the latest scientific research, clinical trials, and business news.
Abstract: Currently, there are no approved pharmacotherapies for addiction to cocaine and other psychostimulant drugs. Several studies have proposed that...
Read moreCredits: Albert Batalla†, Hella Janssen†, Shiral S. Gangadin and Matthijs G. Bossong († These authors contributed equally to this work.)...
Read moreAuthors: Kimberly A. Babson1 & James Sottile 2 & Danielle Morabito1 Publish Date: 27 March 2017 Published by: Springer Science+Business...
Read more